Volume 13, Issue 3 (10-2010)                   Hakim 2010, 13(3): 165-176 | Back to browse issues page

XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Attar Jannesar Nobari F, Tofighi Sh, Hafezimoghadam P, Maleki MR, Goharinezhad S. Risk Assessment of Processes of Rasoule Akram Emergency Department by the Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) Methodology . Hakim 2010; 13 (3) :165-176
URL: http://hakim.tums.ac.ir/article-1-713-en.html
1- , f.jannesar@gmail.com
Abstract:   (24893 Views)

  

  

  

 Attar Jannesar Nobari F * 1 ( MSc ), Tofighi Sh2 ( PhD ), Hafezimoghadam P3 (MD), Maleki MR1 ( PhD ), Goharinezhad S1 (MSc)

 

  1 Department of Health Services Management, Faculty of Management &

  Information Sciences, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

  2 Health Management Research Center, Baghiatallah Medical Sciences Research Center, Tehran, Iran

  3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine,

  Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

 

  Received: 16 Jun 2010, Accepted: 11 Oct 2010

 

 

  Abstract

 

  Introduction: According to classification of the Emergency Department (ED) as a high-risk area in a hospital, failures of six problematic emergency processes in Rasoule Akram Emergency Department were identified, assessed, prioritized, and analyzed in order to improve patients' safety. The Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA), as one of the risk management techniques, was used for the analysis.

  Methods: This was a descriptive research that quantitatively and qualitatively analyzed some failure modes and effects. FMEA is a team-based, systematic, proactive technique that is used to prevent process and product problems before they occur. For identification of root causes of the analyzed failures, Eindhoven Classification Model (ECM) was used.

  Results: By FMEA, 51 failure modes in the 6 selected emergency processes were identified and assessed. With the 75% reliability, 16 failure modes (with RPN ³ 250) were identified and entitled as "failures with non-acceptable risk", and then root causes of them were classified by ECM.

  Conclusion: According to these result, Proactive FMEA was an efficient and effective method for identifying and prioritizing the improvable points of a running process in a crowded and complex hospital ward, such as an ED.

 

  Key words: Risk Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) Emergency Process Emergency ward

 

  Hakim Research Journal 2010 13(3): 165- 176.

 



  * Corresponding Author: Floor 11, Center of Management Development and Administrative Evolution, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Between Falamak and Zarafshan st, Simaye Iran st, Shahrak Gharb, Tehran, Iran.
Postal Code: 1467664961, Tel: +98- 21- 81452758 , Fax: +98- 21- 88363844, Email:f.jannesar@gmail.com

Full-Text [PDF 364 kb]   (8043 Downloads)    

Received: 2011/02/16 | Published: 2010/10/15

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Hakim Journal

Designed & Developed by: Yektaweb