Volume 24, Issue 3 (12-2021)
Hakim 2021, 24(3): 227-240 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
shahidi sadeghi N, seddighi S, bakhtiyari M, Mokhtari M. Evaluation of Implementation Laws Related to the Health Sector in the sixth Development Plan. Hakim 2021; 24 (3) :227-240
URL: http://hakim.tums.ac.ir/article-1-2133-en.html
URL: http://hakim.tums.ac.ir/article-1-2133-en.html
1- Ph.D. in healthcare management, Department of Health, Islamic Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran.
2- Ph.D. in health policy, Department of Health, Islamic Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran. ,mhdmktp@gmail.com
2- Ph.D. in health policy, Department of Health, Islamic Parliament Research Center of the Islamic Republic of Iran, Tehran, Iran. ,
Abstract: (787 Views)
Introduction: the present study evaluated the implementation of legal materials related to health in the Sixth Development Plan.
Method: The present study was a triangulation combined study in 2022. The first stage was carried out with the aim of identifying the measures including documentary analysis, using the data collection form, and the data collected by the research team were refined separately and using contract content analysis. In the second stage, the evaluation indicators including the review of documents and the data collection form, the calculated indicators were sent in the form of a researcher-made questionnaire, and using experts meeting through the discussion framework. The third stage was conducted with using questionnaire approved and completed by three groups including the apparatus and its affiliated units, foreign experts and supervising experts.
Results: Based on the findings, 122 indicators were used separately for legal clauses. The highest distribution of foreign experts’ scores was in percentages of less than 25 and 26 to 50, and this distribution was largely similar for observer experts. On average, the rate of progress of the verdicts was 49%, foreign experts 43% and the opinion of the apparatus with a large difference of 87%. About 60% of the opinion of the supervising experts and evaluators were similar. The focus of foreign experts has been more on outcome indicators. About 43% of the 122 indicators were part of the support document or quantitative indicators with the documents provided by the executive body.
Conclusion: Reviewing and evaluating the progress of development plans, depending on their generalities and details, can include very small to large indicators. Also, the use of three groups of evaluators, the use of different sources to enumerate the indicators, relying on official documents such as supporting documents and monitoring devices, as well as presenting the progress of program implementation separately for each of the legal materials are other strengths of this research.
Method: The present study was a triangulation combined study in 2022. The first stage was carried out with the aim of identifying the measures including documentary analysis, using the data collection form, and the data collected by the research team were refined separately and using contract content analysis. In the second stage, the evaluation indicators including the review of documents and the data collection form, the calculated indicators were sent in the form of a researcher-made questionnaire, and using experts meeting through the discussion framework. The third stage was conducted with using questionnaire approved and completed by three groups including the apparatus and its affiliated units, foreign experts and supervising experts.
Results: Based on the findings, 122 indicators were used separately for legal clauses. The highest distribution of foreign experts’ scores was in percentages of less than 25 and 26 to 50, and this distribution was largely similar for observer experts. On average, the rate of progress of the verdicts was 49%, foreign experts 43% and the opinion of the apparatus with a large difference of 87%. About 60% of the opinion of the supervising experts and evaluators were similar. The focus of foreign experts has been more on outcome indicators. About 43% of the 122 indicators were part of the support document or quantitative indicators with the documents provided by the executive body.
Conclusion: Reviewing and evaluating the progress of development plans, depending on their generalities and details, can include very small to large indicators. Also, the use of three groups of evaluators, the use of different sources to enumerate the indicators, relying on official documents such as supporting documents and monitoring devices, as well as presenting the progress of program implementation separately for each of the legal materials are other strengths of this research.
Keywords: Evaluation, performance evaluation, development plan, health sector, sixth development plan.
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
General
Received: 2022/03/22 | Accepted: 2021/12/1 | Published: 2021/12/1
Received: 2022/03/22 | Accepted: 2021/12/1 | Published: 2021/12/1
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
