Volume 22, Issue 4 (12-2019)
Hakim 2019, 22(4): 273-283 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Bouzarjomehri H, Akbari Sari A, Jafari Pooyan E, Herandi Y, Rajaee S. Comparative Study of Hospitals’ Transparency in Eight Countries. Hakim 2019; 22 (4) :273-283
URL: http://hakim.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1943-en.html
URL: http://hakim.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1943-en.html
Hossein Bouzarjomehri1 
, Ali Akbari Sari * 2, Ebrahim Jafari Pooyan1 , Yasaman Herandi1 , Soheila Rajaee3
, Ali Akbari Sari * 2, Ebrahim Jafari Pooyan1 , Yasaman Herandi1 , Soheila Rajaee3
1- Tehran University of Medical Sciences
2- Tehran University of Medical Sciences ,akbarisari@tums.ac.ir
3- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
2- Tehran University of Medical Sciences ,
3- Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
Abstract: (1541 Views)
Comparative Study of Hospitals’ Transparency in Eight Countries
Hossein Bouzarjomehri1, Ali Akbari-Sari2*, Ebrahim Jafari-Pooyan3, Yasaman Herandi4, Soheila Rajaie5
1M.Sc. in Healthcare Management, Health Economics and Management Group, Faculty of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Professor, Ph.D. in Healthcare Management & Health Policy, Health Economics and Management Group, Faculty of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Healthcare Management, Health Economics and Management Group, Faculty of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Pharm.D., Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5M.Sc. Student in Health Economics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Information asymmetry leads to less informed patients in choosing healthcare providers. Therefore, countries have moved forward to increase providers’ transparency, information symmetry and patients’ power. This study was designed to compare countries’ experiences about hospitals’ transparency.
Methods: The list of countries in this comparative study was prepared with the help of the Global Open Data Index and Open Data Barometer. Searching for official websites with keywords like “hospital transparency” and “hospital comparing tool,” the final websites were obtained. Finally, indicators and types of organization of these websites were compared.
Results: Websites from eight countries were selected. The number of indicators for comparing hospitals was variable, from 17 in Australia to 195 in the UK. Type of indicators could be categorized into several groups, including waiting times, length of stay, patients’ experience, staff’s experience, treatment outcomes, infection control, and price of care. Studied experiences showed that countries developed hospitals’ transparency due to their needs and limitations. Some countries like the UK and the US were pioneers but there is a global trend to develop transparency in the health system.
Conclusion: By increasing public awareness, governments moved forward to develop transparency and the health sector was not an exception. Although private companies and startups are engaged in these innovations, governments have the main role to build the legal, political, and data infrastructures. Therefore, it is recommended that Iranian policymakers and politicians develop transparency of hospitals and health systems gradually using global experiences and considering domestic conditions and capacities.
Keywords: Transparency; Access to Information; Choice Behavior; Public Reporting; Information Symmetry; Hospital
*Corresponding Author: Department of Health Management and Economics, 4th Floor, New Building, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98-2188989128, Fax: +98-2188989129, Email: akbarisari@tums.ac.ir
Hossein Bouzarjomehri1, Ali Akbari-Sari2*, Ebrahim Jafari-Pooyan3, Yasaman Herandi4, Soheila Rajaie5
1M.Sc. in Healthcare Management, Health Economics and Management Group, Faculty of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2Professor, Ph.D. in Healthcare Management & Health Policy, Health Economics and Management Group, Faculty of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
3Associate Professor, Ph.D. in Healthcare Management, Health Economics and Management Group, Faculty of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
4Pharm.D., Faculty of Pharmacy, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
5M.Sc. Student in Health Economics, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
Introduction: Information asymmetry leads to less informed patients in choosing healthcare providers. Therefore, countries have moved forward to increase providers’ transparency, information symmetry and patients’ power. This study was designed to compare countries’ experiences about hospitals’ transparency.
Methods: The list of countries in this comparative study was prepared with the help of the Global Open Data Index and Open Data Barometer. Searching for official websites with keywords like “hospital transparency” and “hospital comparing tool,” the final websites were obtained. Finally, indicators and types of organization of these websites were compared.
Results: Websites from eight countries were selected. The number of indicators for comparing hospitals was variable, from 17 in Australia to 195 in the UK. Type of indicators could be categorized into several groups, including waiting times, length of stay, patients’ experience, staff’s experience, treatment outcomes, infection control, and price of care. Studied experiences showed that countries developed hospitals’ transparency due to their needs and limitations. Some countries like the UK and the US were pioneers but there is a global trend to develop transparency in the health system.
Conclusion: By increasing public awareness, governments moved forward to develop transparency and the health sector was not an exception. Although private companies and startups are engaged in these innovations, governments have the main role to build the legal, political, and data infrastructures. Therefore, it is recommended that Iranian policymakers and politicians develop transparency of hospitals and health systems gradually using global experiences and considering domestic conditions and capacities.
Keywords: Transparency; Access to Information; Choice Behavior; Public Reporting; Information Symmetry; Hospital
| Please cite this article as follows: Bouzarjomehri H, Akbari-Sari A, Jafari-Pooyan E, Herandi Y, Rajaie S. Comparative study of hospitals’ transparency in eight countries. Hakim Health Sys Res. 2019; 22(4): 273-283. |
*Corresponding Author: Department of Health Management and Economics, 4th Floor, New Building, School of Public Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran. Tel: +98-2188989128, Fax: +98-2188989129, Email: akbarisari@tums.ac.ir
Keywords: Transparency, Access to Information, Choice Behavior, Public Reporting, Information Symmetry, Hospital
Type of Study: Applicable |
Subject:
General
Received: 2019/08/13 | Accepted: 2020/06/14 | Published: 2020/06/14
Received: 2019/08/13 | Accepted: 2020/06/14 | Published: 2020/06/14
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
