Volume 23, Issue 1 (3-2020)
Hakim 2020, 23(1): 6-13 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Ghalenoei E, baradaran eftekhari M, ebadifar A, malekzadeh R. Qualitative Research Evaluation Based on Peer Review in Iranian Medical Research Centers: Experiences From I.R.Iran. Hakim 2020; 23 (1) :6-13
URL: http://hakim.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1928-en.html
URL: http://hakim.tums.ac.ir/article-1-1928-en.html
1- MSc of Entomology, Deputy for Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran.
2- Associate Professor, MD, PhD of Social Dereminants of Health, Deputy for Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran. ,mbeftekhari200@gmail.com
3- Associate Professor, DDS, MSd, Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Professor of Digestive Diseseses, MD, Digestive Disease Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Associate Professor, MD, PhD of Social Dereminants of Health, Deputy for Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran. ,
3- Associate Professor, DDS, MSd, Dentofacial Deformities Research Center, Research Institute of Dental Sciences, Department of Orthodontics, Dental School, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
4- Professor of Digestive Diseseses, MD, Digestive Disease Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Abstract: (537 Views)
AIntroduction: Research evaluation based on peer review is done to assess the quality of research. In this article, the peer review evaluation results of selected Iranian research centers are presented.
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted through peer review with 106 and 15 Iranian professors from inside and outside the country, respectively. The evaluation was implemented in four areas of leadership, structure, research products, and impact. In this study, research centers with independent research budget lines and 12 top research centers during 2015-2018 were evaluated.
Results: The most weaknesses in these research centers were in leadership (scattered work, island and parallel activities) and impact (inefficiency of knowledge utilization in transfer chains) areas, and the greatest strengths were related to knowledge production (quantitative and qualitative development in the number of published articles and citations). In the structural part, the lack of attention to technological activities, the lack of applicability of research, and inadequate physical space were the most important weaknesses.
Conclusion: In the peer review method, the assessment of leadership, structure, and in particular, impact areas has a very important role in research quality promotion due to appropriate interactions with specialists and peers.
*Corresponding Author: Deputy for Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran. Tel :(+98)2181455184. E-mail: mbeftekhari200@gmail.com
Methods: A qualitative study was conducted through peer review with 106 and 15 Iranian professors from inside and outside the country, respectively. The evaluation was implemented in four areas of leadership, structure, research products, and impact. In this study, research centers with independent research budget lines and 12 top research centers during 2015-2018 were evaluated.
Results: The most weaknesses in these research centers were in leadership (scattered work, island and parallel activities) and impact (inefficiency of knowledge utilization in transfer chains) areas, and the greatest strengths were related to knowledge production (quantitative and qualitative development in the number of published articles and citations). In the structural part, the lack of attention to technological activities, the lack of applicability of research, and inadequate physical space were the most important weaknesses.
Conclusion: In the peer review method, the assessment of leadership, structure, and in particular, impact areas has a very important role in research quality promotion due to appropriate interactions with specialists and peers.
| Please cite this article as follows: Ghalenoei E, Baradaran Eftekhari M, Ebadifar A, Malekzadeh R. Qualitative research evaluation based on peer review in Iranian medical research centers: experiences from I.R.Iran. Hakim Health Sys Res. 2020; 23(1): 6-13. |
*Corresponding Author: Deputy for Research and Technology, Ministry of Health and Medical Education, Tehran, Iran. Tel :(+98)2181455184. E-mail: mbeftekhari200@gmail.com
Type of Study: Original |
Subject:
General
Received: 2019/07/2 | Accepted: 2020/03/20 | Published: 2020/03/20
Received: 2019/07/2 | Accepted: 2020/03/20 | Published: 2020/03/20
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
